Latter Rain movement (New Order of the Latter Rain)
The New Order of the Latter Rain erupted in 1948 at Sharon Orphanage and Schools in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, and spread rapidly through healing-revival Pentecostalism. Its signature teachings — the restoration of living apostles and prophets, the impartation of spiritual gifts through the laying on of hands, and the 'manifest sons of God' expectation of an end-times overcomer company — were formally rejected by the Assemblies of God in 1949. The movement itself remained decentralised and largely non-coercive, but its doctrinal toolkit became the foundation on which later, higher-control streams (shepherding-style discipleship and the modern apostolic-prophetic networks) were built.
CLCI radar
BITE breakdown
0 — a decentralised revival stream rather than a membership organisation; scored for its doctrinal mechanics (living apostles, impartation, manifest sons teaching) which later movements operationalised with much higher control.
Profile facts
In context
The Latter Rain began as a reaction against perceived institutional dryness in post-war Pentecostalism. At Sharon Orphanage and Schools in February 1948, students and teachers under George Hawtin, Percy Hunt, and Herrick Holt reported an outpouring marked by prophecy, healing, and the directed impartation of gifts through laying on of hands — a practice departure from classical Pentecostalism, where gifts were understood to be sovereignly given.
The revival spread through camp meetings and independent congregations across North America. Its core doctrinal innovations were three. First, restorationism: God was restoring the offices of apostle and prophet to the end-times church, making living men the carriers of governmental spiritual authority. Second, impartation: spiritual power and callings could be transferred person-to-person, with prophetic presbyteries pronouncing destinies over individuals. Third, the 'manifest sons of God' teaching: an overcoming company would attain unprecedented spiritual stature — in its strongest forms, victory over death itself — before Christ's return.
The Assemblies of God rejected these teachings by resolution in 1949, and the movement never formed a denomination. Precisely because it remained a doctrine-stream rather than an organisation, the Latter Rain scores modestly on operational control: there was no central membership, no financial capture, no exit apparatus.
Its significance for this catalogue is genealogical. The doctrinal package — living apostles with governmental authority, personal prophecy as guidance, impartation hierarchies — is inherently high-leverage: it concentrates unaccountable authority in charismatic individuals and makes members' decisions subject to prophetic direction. Later movements operationalised that leverage: the shepherding/discipleship stream of the 1970s and today's apostolic-prophetic networks (documented at the New Apostolic Reformation profile) trace their governing concepts directly to Latter Rain restorationism. The movement is thus scored here as a moderate-band historical stream whose ideas, in tighter organisational containers, produced substantially higher-control outcomes.
Key control doctrines
- Living apostles and prophets as restored governmental offices
- Impartation — transferable spiritual power and destiny through laying on of hands
- Manifest sons of God — an end-times overcomer company attaining extraordinary spiritual stature
General high-control-group recovery resources
Group-specific recovery resources have not yet been curated for this entry. The general references below apply across most high-control-group exits; see /resources for the full directory.
- ICSA (International Cultic Studies Association) — Global referral and information service for questions about high-control groups; runs a helpline and a directory of cult-aware therapists.
- Freedom of Mind Resource Center — Steven Hassan's organisation — BITE-model assessments, family-side guidance, and exit-counselling resources.
- ICSA Cult-Aware Therapist Directory — ICSA-maintained directory of licensed mental-health professionals with specific cult-recovery training.
- Combatting Cult Mind Control (Steven Hassan) — Foundational BITE-model book covering the structural mechanics of high-control groups and recovery; revised edition 2018.
- Take Back Your Life: Recovering from Cults and Abusive Relationships (Lalich & Tobias) — Practical recovery workbook by Janja Lalich and Madeleine Tobias.
See the full curated list at /resources.
Legal cases & controversies
- Denominational rejection by the Assemblies of God (1949); no central legal cases — the movement had no corporate body
Evidence by BITE axis
- No central organisation controlled members' daily lives; congregational practice varied widely.
- Revival networks and publications created a strong internal narrative but without suppression apparatus.
- Restorationist certainty, elite overcomer identity, and prophecy-as-guidance are high-leverage thought mechanics; criticism was framed as resisting what God was restoring.
- Destiny pronouncements and end-times elite expectation created significant hope/fear leverage over adherents' self-understanding.
Timeline
- 1948Revival begins at Sharon Orphanage and Schools, North Battleford, Saskatchewan
- 1949Assemblies of God formally rejects Latter Rain teachings as error
- 1951Movement spreads through independent congregations and camp meetings across North America
- 1965Latter Rain concepts flow into emerging charismatic-movement streams
- 1996C. Peter Wagner begins popularising 'New Apostolic Reformation' language for networks carrying restored-apostle doctrine forward
Sources
- Assemblies of God General Council resolution rejecting the New Order of the Latter Rain (1949) search ↗
- Richard Riss's historical studies of the Latter Rain movement search ↗
- Academic histories of post-war healing revivalism and Pentecostal restorationism search ↗
- Scholarly analyses tracing apostolic-prophetic network doctrine to Latter Rain roots search ↗
We cite sources by name and outlet rather than fabricating links. Where a source includes its own URL, the open ↗ link opens it directly; otherwise search ↗runs a Google Scholar query for the cited title — useful for verifying academic sources. For news outlets, search the outlet's own archive.
Key terms in this profile
Relevant hubs
Curated entry points on CLCI Hub for situations connected to this group.
You may also want to explore
Frequently asked questions
Q.Is Latter Rain movement a cult?
CLCI Hub deliberately avoids the binary label "cult." Instead it places groups on a transparent 0–40 spectrum of documented control using Steven Hassan's BITE model (Behaviour, Information, Thought, Emotional). Latter Rain movement scores 15 out of 40 — "Moderate Control", at medium confidence. The score describes documented control patterns, not a judgement of members' sincerity or beliefs; many members do not personally experience the patterns listed.
Q.What is Latter Rain movement's CLCI score?
Latter Rain movement scores 15 out of 40 on the Cult-Like Control Index, which falls in the "Moderate" band. That total is the sum of four BITE axes — Behaviour 3, Information 3, Thought 5, Emotional 4 — plus a signed modifier of +0 for aggravating or mitigating factors.
Q.Why does Latter Rain movement score 15 on the CLCI?
The score reflects publicly documented patterns including: Restoration of living 'apostles and prophets' holding governmental spiritual authority; Personal prophecy and prophetic presbytery as a guidance mechanism over individuals' lives; Impartation hierarchies concentrating spiritual authority in charismatic individuals; 'Manifest sons of God' overcomer teaching creating an elite spiritual class expectation. These map onto the BITE axes of behaviour, information, thought, and emotional control, and a signed modifier of +0 is applied for factors such as financial demands, leadership accountability, and exit costs. Every claim is backed by the citations in the Sources section on this page.
Q.How reliable is the Latter Rain movement rating?
This profile is rated Medium confidence. Medium confidence means the score rests on reputable journalism plus consistent ex-member testimony. CLCI scores are not fixed — they are revised whenever new public evidence appears, and groups that reform can score lower over time.
Q.Where can I get help regarding Latter Rain movement?
If you or someone you care about is affected by Latter Rain movement, start with the Recovery resources listed on this page. General cult-aware support is available from the International Cultic Studies Association (icsahome.com) and the Freedom of Mind Resource Center (freedomofmind.com). CLCI Hub is an educational resource, not a crisis service — if anyone is in immediate danger, contact local emergency services.
Found something wrong on this profile?
We accept correction requests from anyone — current and former members, researchers, journalists, family members, and the listed organisation. Submissions are reviewed by an editor; we do not auto-publish.